Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Subliminal Harassment

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE. — JIP | Talk 05:03, 4 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Too much too coherent nonsense to delete it speedily, so I guess it must hang around at AfD for a week. Pilatus 11:22, 26 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Agreed Sapient 11:29, 26 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• A whole week seems too much for this crap. Speedy delete, please. --DrTorstenHenning 11:48, 26 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - nonsense, presumably created in order to drive traffic to the linked site. CLW 12:06, 26 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, though "Properly executed subliminal harassment give all the benefits of traditional overt harassment but none of the legal liabilities" is my sentence of the week. Vizjim 12:19, 26 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment looks like Kappa spotted a copyvio. MCB 06:27, 27 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.