- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 11:31, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Subset theorem (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
A clear hoax and a good example of WP:MADEUP nadav 21:38, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
(This AfD was wrongly listed. Mr Stephen 23:24, 9 May 2007 (UTC))[reply]
- Delete. Obvious hoax. Wikipedia is not for things made up in school one day. --Mr Stephen 23:24, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete as a totally obvious hoax, bordering on nonsense. Veinor (talk to me) 23:56, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong delete. Sadly, hoax is not a speedy deletion criterion. But this is the clearest example I've seen of Wikipedia is not for things made up in school one day. It even explicitly says "the theorem simply came to Vasimalla one day in maths class" right in the article. —David Eppstein 05:11, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong delete. Obvious hoax. Article was created by User:Archibald Egglestein, and it references "The Memoirs of Archibald Egglestein". More of this subset theorem nonsense here has been reverted. PrimeHunter 21:19, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as a hoax. This could be speedied under WP:SNOW andy 18:06, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Especially as I've just noticed it's already been deleted once before. andy 18:08, 13 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.