Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Substitute fielder

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was REDIRECT to Substitute (cricket). Owen× ☎ 18:13, 27 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

This is a dictionary definition, I don't think there is enough for a complete article on it. - Akamad 07:28, 22 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect to Substitute (cricket). JPD 11:51, 22 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect as per JPD. It's a perfectly legitimate topic, in my opinion. but, unfortunately, it's a dupe. --Frag 22:13, 22 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect as per JPD Tintin 23:26, 23 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect -- Ian ≡ talk 00:07, 24 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy redirect. What they said. Stephen Turner 12:14, 24 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedily redirected. - Mike Rosoft 16:53, 27 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.