Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Success measures
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mailer Diablo 13:27, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This article is not very notable and is difficult to verify. --GoOdCoNtEnT 22:54, 12 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete there is absolutely no evidence on the internet about this man's life. --GoOdCoNtEnT 22:57, 12 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: "No evidence on the internet" is not a reason to delete something, nor a reason to speedy delete it. But this certainly looks suspicious. There is no entry in the ADB/NDB index matching this person, and no entry in WBIS Online either. It should be deleted unless it can be verified somewhere else. up+land 23:18, 12 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Non-speedy Delete unless verified by the end of the AfD. Strong suspicion of hoax but hoaxes aren't speediable. ~ trialsanderrors 23:47, 12 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete for failure of WP:BIO Alphachimp talk 23:49, 12 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete unless someone can explain to me why this person was a "famous German physicist" and back it up with a source. RFerreira 00:15, 13 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. As it stands now, the article fails WP:V and I have been unable to locate other sources. --Satori Son 16:07, 13 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I almost put a speedy tag on this entry last night, then changed my mind. Baseball,Baby! balls•strikes 19:55, 13 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: The user account used to create this article was a vandal account and has been permanently blocked. In the edit summary, they also admitted to making this up, so I guess we have our answer. Some admin should Speedy Delete. --Satori Son 00:24, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mailer Diablo 13:28, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Apparently part of a short lived OR campaign by the departed User:Rimini. No hits for googling "Success measures" + "Copernicus factor".TheGrappler 19:38, 12 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, nonnotable original corpospeak. NawlinWiki 19:55, 12 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete fails WP:NOR Alphachimp talk 20:16, 12 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as unverifiable. OhNoitsJamie Talk 20:55, 12 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Melchoir 21:13, 12 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. --GoOdCoNtEnT 22:58, 12 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. - Baseball,Baby! balls•strikes 19:57, 13 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.