Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sugapuff

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 13:24, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sugapuff

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Sugapuff (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional. Does not meet GNG. Sources include a deadlink, coverage from an outlet that employed him, and an interview on BBC Asian. BEFORE mainly brings up items from his YouTube channel. Icewhiz (talk) 13:33, 13 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 13:33, 13 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 13:33, 13 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:27, 13 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:27, 13 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —AE (talk • contributions) 12:54, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - does not meet WP:GNG. The first source may or may not count, as it has only one paragraph about him in an article about three people (although it may be mentioning him for something notable; I'm not entirely sure), the second is a primary source, and the third is an audio clip which is not available. Searching elsewhere finds little that is not primary or extremely minor. LittlePuppers (talk) 00:30, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.