Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sultanate of Rotonda

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mailer Diablo 10:49, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's already been prodded and contested. Unverified, non-notable, hoax, ....

• Delete as per my nom. Dlyons493 Talk 02:46, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete this nonsense. On July 17, 2006, at about 5pm, Miguel Torres and Francisco Costa declared independence of the Sultanate of Rotonda from Portugal. User:Zoe|^(talk) 02:49, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete This is a hoax GG -- Librarianofages 02:53, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Since micronations in general don't actually exist, I'm not sure how one can be fake, but certainly it's unverifiable and non-notable. Fan-1967 03:02, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per my nom. -- Alias Flood 03:17, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. —C.Fred (talk) 03:58, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. SynergeticMaggot 06:23, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong delete per nom. Voice of Treason 07:43, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as unverifiable. --Coredesat talk. o.o;; 08:25, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as unverifiable... besides, Sultanate of Rotonda no longer exists... it was just annexed by the Almighty Nation of Isotopia.--Isotope23 15:19, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Can you verify that? If not, we won't accept Isotopia. Fan-1967 02:26, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I guess I could create an Isotopia article stating that it lays claim to the territory of Talk:Sultanate of Rotonda... but somehow I think that would violate WP:POINT. Would it be WP:V if I added a statement declaring "victory in a bloodless coup" to my blog? My blog is a WP:RS right? Heh.--Isotope23 14:33, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete I couldn't believe when I saw this article the first time. A tad scary the effort put into it. GassyGuy 21:13, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Obvious hoax. Too much time on somebody's hands, and/or too many screwdrivers. Oh, and I don't recognize Isotopia's claims. :-) --Pc13 22:22, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Stop it, you're killing me. Speedy delete Antares33712 18:53, 21 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.