Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sundicators

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — MusikAnimal ^talk 05:19, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sundicators

Sundicators (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable product. No independent sources to be found. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 16:22, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Other then it exists there is nothing to show that it is notable - Pmedema (talk) 16:37, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:48, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:48, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: no independent sources. Also, Wikipedia is not a manual. G S Palmer (talk • contribs) 18:25, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: product spam by new SPA editor whom I would assume is the same "ALev310" advertizing on Twitter thus (you may have to tap "SHOW OLDER" a few times at the bottom of the screen to reveal the evidence): " @ALEV310 Alexandra L. RT @PRNAlert: .@SunscreenBands from @JADS_InterNat Allow Families to Practice #SafeSun While Measuring UV Exposure prn.to/1dPN4al ". Edit comment at article creation reads "Wanted to add a page about this product to Wikipedia as a Press Release will be submitted within the next few weeks," which more or less confirms that this person is associated with the company (how else would they know about an upcoming-but-still-unreleased press release?). In their defense, editor appears to be new to Wikipedia rather than an experienced sock. Pax 07:29, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Insufficient coverage from independent sources to support notability.  ^B E _C K ^Y _S A ^{Y L} E _S  00:36, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.