Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sunico Films

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Thanks to article improvements by MichaelQSchmidt. Randykitty (talk) 10:53, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sunico Films

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Small film production company that produced one film in 1993 and one 14 years later in 2007. Sunico Production seems to be the correct name, but no matter what I fail to find anything but fleeting mention, at least in English. Fails WP:GNG, fails WP:CORP. -- Sam ^Sing! 02:54, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Denmark-related deletion discussions. ^BE _CK ^Y _SA ^{Y L}E _S 14:49, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. ^BE _CK ^Y _SA ^{Y L}E _S 14:49, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. ^BE _CK ^Y _SA ^{Y L}E _S 14:49, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Rcsprinter₁₂₃ (commune) @ 20:17, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Doesn't really meet nobility — JudeccaXIII (talk) 02:09, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as suitable sourced stub article about a film production and distribution company set up to preserve Pakistan's Sindhi culture, language, and traditions through film. The article may never become more than a stub, but that's okay. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 20:07, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Well done! -- Sam ^Sing! 20:34, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:04, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.