- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was no consensus – Gurch 15:09, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Original prod'd as "notability/reads like an advert". I concur. Wickethewok 20:42, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete As the proder, I should agree with myself. Yanksox 20:49, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:N and WP:NOT (soapbox #3). --Slgrandson 20:57, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as per nomination. Nertz 00:21, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep It could be made acceptable through some edits.Kazari 17:12, 7 June 2006 (UTC) (I have now edited the article extensively (although I forgot to log on first). I have addressed the notability aspect -- which I think is wrong -- by posting the 2006 participant list. I have addressed the advert issue by reducing the advocacy material to the barebones of the matter. I would strenuously argue against deletion at this point. Kazari 18:12, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep. Google returns 44 400 hits for "Sunshine Week" "Open Government", I'm not sure if it's NN. --Zoz (t) 18:14, 9 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Kazari's edits and the list of participants seem to clearly assert notability. Deleuze 14:13, 14 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.