- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. — TKD::Talk 00:14, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable commercial product (and poorly written article). -- Alan Liefting talk 09:03, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete unless reliable third-party sources with substantial coverage can be found. Jakew 10:42, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Google News finds one mention in something called Mining Weekly, and I don't think that's really enough. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 13:36, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 23:53, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Product and producer seem to the be the same, so fails WP:CORP too. --Gavin Collins 13:20, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.