Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Super OS X Panther
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete housekeeping non-admin closure. 10:18, 28 April 2013 Boing! said Zebedee (talk | contribs) deleted page Super OS X Panther (Multiple reasons: speedy deletion criteria A7, G3) czar · · 21:58, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Super OS X Panther (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The software mentioned is apparently a clone of the corresponding Mac OS X software, and it doesn't appear to meet notability requirements. The external links supplied in the article do not satisfy the notability requirements as they do not appear to be sources that are significant enough to establish notability. In addition, the current content of the article appears to be copied from another Wikipedia article with minor changes. —DragonLord(talk/contribs) 18:54, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. czar · · 20:22, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. czar · · 20:22, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete A7. I made the mistake of following this rabbit hole. It's a ten-year-old's web project for simulating OS X in MIT's Scratch environment (that's in look only, not functionality). The "system requirements" are all made up. Absolutely no critical coverage. I'll never get those ten minutes back. czar · · 20:33, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- I did not put the article up for speedy deletion because it was not under one of the categories for CSD A7. I saw it as software, not web content. (As a side note, I'm not sure why you feel those ten minutes were important...) —DragonLord(talk/contribs) 21:00, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Changed speedy deletion to CSD G3. From what I can tell, the page is a hoax. —DragonLord(talk/contribs) 21:31, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- It fits A7 because the subject matter is web content—it isn't actually installable (though it may appear that way if skimming the bs). Perhaps it fits G3 too—we'll see what the mod says. And ten minutes are very important when there's so much else to do! czar · · 22:22, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Tagged with
{{db-multiple}}for both A7 and G3. —DragonLord(talk/contribs) 22:52, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Tagged with
- It fits A7 because the subject matter is web content—it isn't actually installable (though it may appear that way if skimming the bs). Perhaps it fits G3 too—we'll see what the mod says. And ten minutes are very important when there's so much else to do! czar · · 22:22, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Changed speedy deletion to CSD G3. From what I can tell, the page is a hoax. —DragonLord(talk/contribs) 21:31, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- I did not put the article up for speedy deletion because it was not under one of the categories for CSD A7. I saw it as software, not web content. (As a side note, I'm not sure why you feel those ten minutes were important...) —DragonLord(talk/contribs) 21:00, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.