- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 02:35, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia is not a game guide or any other form of how-to. --Stellmach 01:14, 5 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. BigHaz 01:16, 5 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as WP:NOT, an incredibly brief article that makes no case for its subject's notability. I can't imagine what would happen if we had articles on every in-game move in every game conceived. -- H·G (words/works) 01:40, 5 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete fancruft. Aplomado talk 01:46, 5 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. -- Alias Flood 01:50, 5 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. ViridaeTalk 02:08, 5 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete WP:NOT. --ColourBurst 03:58, 5 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per everyone. Danny Lilithborne 09:54, 5 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom Konman72 11:23, 5 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been added to the list of CVG deletions. RandyWang (raves/review me!) 14:06, 5 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom--Peephole 14:29, 5 August 2006 (UTC)--[reply]
- Delete Thsi isn't even a very good guide and making articles abotu every glitch that's appeared in a game would just be silly. Ace of Sevens 21:30, 5 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong delete, Wikipedia is not High Impact Halo. --Coredesat talk. ^_^ 03:09, 6 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.