- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 06:46, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Basically an ad, though it's a strange product to be advertising to encyclopedia readers. 113 Google hits. Opabinia regalis 05:09, 15 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as spam. On a side note: What!? aren't Opabinia tagged with superflexitags? ;-) -- Koffieyahoo 06:04, 15 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Nah, with the five eyes we can see the taggers coming from a mile away. You just think we're extinct. Opabinia regalis 06:42, 15 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, advertising. JIP | Talk 06:23, 15 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete — spam Martinp23 20:21, 15 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I did a double-take because I thought it said "superflexitagalistic" for some reason. Baseball,Baby! balls•strikes 20:34, 15 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Superflexitagalisticexpialadosheet, this sounds like a total ad, so kindly please delete. --Sertrel 21:16, 15 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, spam -- Deville (Talk) 22:45, 15 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete spam and doesn't meet WP:Notability criteria for marine mammal identification tags available with hot foil double deep embossed or laser printed as required. - Yomanganitalk 00:12, 16 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.