Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Superfunctionalism
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. Jerry delusional ¤ kangaroo 02:09, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Superfunctionalism (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
This neologism is based on self-published material (through AuthorHouse) which confers no notability; no reliable sources (the Google hits seem entirely based on self-generated PR); WP:FRINGE Accounting4Taste:talk 17:33, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom and WP:NEO, just another protologism. Equendil Talk 18:05, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. The self-published material seems to have had no references or mention within any reliable sources that I was able to find. The only reference I found from a reliable source containing the word "superfunctionalism" used it in a completely different context, in architecture: see [1]. Cazort (talk) 18:50, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Fails WP:N. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 19:58, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Are you insinuating that the belief system does not exist, or there are not enough webpages on it? Anewsuccessllc (talk) 16:48, 17 September 2008 (UTC)—Preceding unsigned comment added by Anewsuccessllc (talk • contribs) 16:43, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The word Superfunctionalism SOUNDS like "scientology" because it is multi-syllabic and starts with an "s" but, it is totally unrelated and therefore should not be subject to an "anonymous" attack Anewsuccessllc (talk) 16:48, 17 September 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Anewsuccessllc (talk • contribs) 16:46, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.