Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Surrency Spooklight

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete, as requested by author on article

Original research & unsourced, was tagged with a speedy {{db-copyvio}} but the editor has claimed to be the author of the website in question (which isn't commercial anyway). Thanks/wangi 22:22, 31 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as OR. There's a number of unsourced quotes in the text, and without citations, this cannot be considered encyclopedic. Akradecki 22:32, 31 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.