- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. ChetblongT C 01:30, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- SurveyEngine (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
There is no indication that this is a notable feature. It is used by a few notable companies and organisations (see Talk), but that does not make SurveyEngine notable, since notability is not inherited. AecisBrievenbus 20:01, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and salt - doesn't appear to be sufficiently notable for inclusion, and has been speedy deleted 3 times. Addhoc (talk) 20:23, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and salt, ditto: essentially unreferenced article about a commercial website, no indicia of notability present. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 20:56, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and salt - unreferenced, and "various people have used it" is not an assertion of notability.--uɐɔlnʌɟoʞǝɹɐs 22:11, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Delete - Non Notable and unreferenced. Canyouhearmenow 23:49, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Read the journals - they refer to the software - not the company. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pfrancois (talk • contribs) 23:47, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - nn company, and no references. Tiptoety talk 23:52, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - No references, no Notability ClanCC (T / C) 08:33, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.