Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Survis Technology
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 21:16, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Survis Technology (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
WP:COI article with no claim of meeting WP:Notability in article. Had been nominated for speedy deletion as an advert, but original editor removed the tag multiple times -- last removal by IP editor. Gsearch comes up with just 7 non-wiki ghits, none of which shows a whiff of notability. Gnews search comes up with 0 hits. Fabrictramp | talk to me 20:45, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 20:46, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete for usual reasons as promoting a NN company, especially considering the original editor's vandalism of removing the speedy delete tag.Theseeker4 (talk) 21:25, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- delete advertising for a non-notable company with no reliable secondary sources.Bali ultimate (talk) 03:15, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete As per info in nom. ChildofMidnight (talk) 06:00, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete for sure. It appears to be a company that specializes in promoting buzzwords. No content = non notable. xschm (talk) 00:16, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.