Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Survival value

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete; editorial redirect possible. Sandstein 16:31, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Survival value

Delete nn neologism, one of a series of "seduction" articles, that are simply expounding the theories of a single author. Mayalld (talk) 15:00, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Rwiggum (^Talk/_Contrib) 17:13, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - non notable. Another overexpansion of an element belonging to the niche "seduction" community. At best it could be merged into a comprehensive "seduction" article instead of being part of a mass spawn of non-notable topics. Rob Banzai (talk) 19:31, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - It appears that this article used to be strictly a biology/chemistry article before it was co-opted by the "seduction community." Unfortunately it has never had references, so the addition of leading text and a single reference to the same "seduction" book gave it the appearance of another over-analyzed "seduction" article. It could be saved if valid supporting references to the original scientific term are included and the "how to pick up girls" aspect is at best minimized in proportion to its real comparative significance. Rob Banzai (talk) 21:59, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merge/Redirect, as the comment above says it is worthwhile but should probably be under a different name. Mathmo ^Talk 10:27, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.