Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sustainable Material Management

Sustainable Material Management

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Ueutyi (talk) 17:09, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sustainable Material Management (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:NOTDIC Ueutyi (talk) 20:47, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: Unreferenced essay. ubiquity (talk) 20:54, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete Copyvio of https://www.epa.gov/smm Adam9007 (talk) 00:06, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Apparently, it's public ___domain. Adam9007 (talk) 00:52, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• This article was AFD tagged FOUR MINUTES after it was created. On top of the AFD, the creator almost certainly got hit by an edit conflict. I also found a more developed version of the article in the creator's sandbox[1] and I just updated the article with the sandbox version. It clearly needs more work, but it's a lot better than the version that got prematurely tagged. The user was clearly in the middle of working on it and got bitten by New Page Patrol being done from the front of the queue.
  WP:NPP says: New page patrollers are highly encouraged to patrol the oldest pages in the queue first (i.e. patrol from the back of the queue). It is often considered disruptive for new page patrollers to add cleanup tags and/or propose the deletion of articles that are only a few minutes old.
  I suggest Ueutyi withdraw this hasty AFD for now. *Maybe* we'll be lucky and the article creator will come back and build it into a worthwhile article. Or maybe someone else will work on it. If not, then we can always AFD it later. Alsee (talk) 13:54, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:53, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. Next time I will take caution. Haven't done NPP in a long time. Ueutyi (talk) 17:01, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]