Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Swagger Sharma

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Owen× ☎ 23:20, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Swagger Sharma

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Swagger Sharma (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable youtuber. None of the sources in the article provide significant coverage of Sharma, and web searches reveal nothing that contributes to WP:GNG, just social media profiles, interviews, and paid-for advertorials. I don't think his work is significant enough for him to pass WP:NACTOR, either. Wham2001 (talk) 20:04, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Film, and India. Wham2001 (talk) 20:04, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Internet and Haryana. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:31, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: per nom TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 14:24, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Fails WP:NACTOR. The youtuber has not made a remarkable or significant achievement, enough to deserve attention. The sources on the page do not have significant coverage on the subject and his career to pass WP:BIO. The reception segment on the page is also wrong and not supported by the source. RangersRus (talk) 15:21, 26 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Promotional. Deb (talk) 08:44, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete for lack of reliable sources. The Times of Indian, like the one in NY, isn’t automatically reliable anymore. Bearian (talk) 19:05, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.