Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Swami Prakashanand Saraswati

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Singularity 06:21, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Swami Prakashanand Saraswati (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Non notable person. Claim to be the foremost disciple of a guru who has been deleted as a non notable. Please see, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jagadguru Kripalu Ji Maharaj. Thanks. Ism schism (talk) 05:32, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions. —Ism schism (talk) 05:36, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong delete Non notable with questionable sources. I have found a few articles accusing him of child molestation, but I dont feel these establishes him as notable. Thanks. Ism schism (talk) 05:36, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, doesn't seem to be all that notable. The references either seem to be local newspapers or blogs, which are pretty flimsy given that most of the article concentrates on accusing him of some pretty horrid things. WP:BLP and all that. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 05:57, 6 May 2008 (UTC).[reply]
• Delete Even if notable, the article should be deleted under speedy deletion of BLP where contemptuous claims are not sourced. Wikidās ॐ 09:21, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Subject doesn't seem particularly notable. Between that and the status of the subject as a BLP and the fact that the subject has poor sourcing available and makes contemptuous claims, I think this is an instance where it is safest to err on the side of caution, and that's not something I say very often. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Celarnor (talk • contribs) 20:19, May 6, 2008

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.