Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sweetcron (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete per consensus. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 13:40, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sweetcron

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The results of the first AfD notwithstanding, this defunct software fails WP:NSOFT. Article has been tagged for notability since 2011 and all links are dead. This is just another failed software project, no indication it was ever notable. Safiel (talk) 14:45, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:53, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - no reliable sources to satisfy WP:GNG and WP:PRODUCT. If this was very important then there would be results from web archives but none exists. Mwenzangu (talk) 01:52, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - The last afd included mention of this arstechnica review: http://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2008/09/hands-on-sweetcron-a-self-hosted-lifestream-service/ Dialectric (talk) 15:24, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SSTflyer 01:05, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as searches found nothing noticeably better. SwisterTwister talk 05:58, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Searches did not turn up enough in-depth coverage to show it passes WP:GNG, and doesn't meet WP:NSOFT. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:47, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.