Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Swisscom-Sendeturm St. Chrischona

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. --Coredesat 05:08, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Swisscom-Sendeturm St. Chrischona (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Another unremarkable mast. I found zero evidence of notability on Google. Contested prod. MER-C 07:31, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep or merge with some other article. Small Google count, but appears to be informative and written well. —Tokek 13:51, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep This tower is more imporantant than most others in AfD. Has references. German Wikipedia has an depth and detailed article on this tower. [1] --Oakshade 22:46, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Keep - I have included the data from the German article to this one, if someone would double-check the "smoothness" of my translation, that would be appreciated. SkierRMH 01:16, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep This seems to be exactly the type of radio tower article we should keep. There are a number of radio tower articles up for deletion. See, e.g. the five listed on 2 January at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Transmitter Truc de Fortunio. As I said there, I find these radio tower articles infinitely more valuable than stubs about individual Eurovision song titles, but I would classify them similarly, namely of particular interest to a small group of widely geographically separated individuals. As such I would question any "of local interest only" tag. In many ways they might be compared to the articles about individual botanical and zoological species. Now rather than piecemeal pick at these radio tower articles, it might be appropriate to ask those interested to develop guidelines for inclusion of individual tower articles, as opposed to general articles like maybe, Radio Towers of France, or maybe by mountain range Radio Towers of the Pyrenees. The general articles could have tables that provide the information now provided by these stubs, and where a full article is appropriate, say like say with Swisscom-Sendeturm St. Chrischona, then those articles could provide a link from the table. --Bejnar 19:05, 2 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.