Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sycophancy (version 2)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 23:49, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sycophancy (version 2)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Sycophancy (version 2) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Dictionary definition that duplicates Sycophancy. It used to be at the latter title until Sycophant was moved there. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 20:01, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete There is really no need for two articles on the topic, the main article is about the English usage of the word and it covers its original meaning in Greek and its history.★Trekker (talk) 12:18, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete we dont need two articles on the same subject. -Roxy the inedible dog . wooF 08:44, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.