- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. —Centrx→talk • 03:17, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Doesn't pass WP:PORNBIO. Epbr123 00:28, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions.
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Coredesat 06:11, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. No multiple non-trivial reliable published sources, no article.-h i s s p a c e r e s e a r c h 11:51, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. No evidence of notability in article as it stands. Tabercil 21:43, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.