Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Synephrine hydrochloride (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to synephrine. Tim Song (talk) 02:56, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Synephrine hydrochloride

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional article looking as if the use of synephrine as a "nutritional supplement" were the standard one, while the use as a drug were only "claimed". See Synephrine#Associated risks for a case study on synephrine as a dietary supplement. The article could also be merged into Synephrine, but there is hardly anything to merge. ἀνυπόδητος (talk) 20:41, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note from nominator: The first deletion discussion is at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/L-Arginine Malate where multiple articles were nominated. Result was "Each article should be judged on its own merit". --ἀνυπόδητος (talk) 20:48, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom, and my nomination statement at the first AfD. Them From Space 21:10, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep If the nominator does not care for the tone of the article then this is best remedied by editing rather than deletion. The chemical compound is well-recognised and covered in numerous reliable sources and so there is no case for deletion. Colonel Warden (talk) 16:26, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to synephrine - trivial salt of free base. We have a long-standing convention to write about the free acid or free base forms, unless the salt is particularly important. --Rifleman 82 (talk) 12:13, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to synephrine per Rifleman 82 - makes sense to combine free base and common salt forms into one article. Boghog (talk) 12:26, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Change to Redirect from nominator. I've started cleaning up some unsupported claims, but think someone else should do the redirect/merge since I'm not strictly NPOV about this and would probably just redirect and lose the content. --ἀνυπόδητος (talk) 12:44, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. —Boghog (talk) 13:57, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to synephrine per Rifleman 82. Anything useful can be merged. — Scientizzle 14:19, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.