Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Syntax Records (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 02:43, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Syntax Records

Non-notable music company, no sources found.. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 13:18, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Also listing Night Owls Compilation Series, a compo series by the label. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 14:14, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. -- Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 14:48, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete both. Some coverage found of artists on the label and releases by the label, but little about the label itself. Not enough out there to justify these articles.--Michig (talk) 17:08, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. I saw enough for a Keep for the label in the previous AfD but I don't see enough now after a second look - one decent source to add to what's there might be enough.--Michig (talk) 20:33, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Night Owls Compilation Series. If any of these releases are notable they should hve their own article. nothing there to suggest the series is notable. Duffbeerforme (talk) 20:25, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.