Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SysadminsInFilm

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 15:50, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

SysadminsInFilm

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

ludicrous and completely indiscriminate list. The fact that we could have a list doesn't mean we should. Ironholds (talk) 18:09, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:SNOW Dlabtot (talk) 18:50, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Ehh? Ironholds (talk) 18:53, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This could be a category, perhaps, but certainly not an article. Trivial list, per logic at WP:LISTCRUFT, recommend delete. Aditya Ex Machina 20:33, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:33, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:33, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Oh damn. I'm an inclusionist and a sysadmin who has appeared in a film and even I say delete. Robert Brockway (talk) 03:59, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I've been in a film too. Must add myself to WikiAdminsInFilm, oh dear, it doesn't exist. Delete. Nancy ^talk 12:16, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Neither does WikiEditorsInFilm. Snow Delete. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 19:18, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment You three up there are a bunch of show offs. =( Aditya Ex Machina 10:56, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment A bit less snarkiness would have been nice. treyka 13:50, 8 April 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Treyka (talk • contribs)

I'm so sorry that you found my comment snarky. That was certainly not the intention. Nancy ^talk 14:51, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Same here. No snarkiness intended. Just underscoring that being part of film's production company does not make a system admin any more or less notable that any other editor who may also be involvd in film in some way. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 20:25, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, guys. MichaelQSchmidt, I do take your point. treyka 11:44, 12 April 2010 (UTC)

Strong delete - and possibly snowball. The oddest, strangest and most whimsical list I've ever seen on Wikipedia. (and most unformatted, and worst name.) Kayau Voting IS evil 01:38, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I think that's a bit over the top. Aditya Ex Machina 18:43, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.