- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. No real arguments to keep, and I see little point in a further relisting Kevin (talk) 05:07, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Syser (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I can't find significant coverage for this software. Joe Chill (talk) 02:13, 15 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment see the article's talk page Josh Parris 03:00, 15 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I did. That doesn't show notability per WP:N. Joe Chill (talk) 03:04, 15 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- - 2/0 (cont.) 08:33, 15 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. This is a 32-bit x86 kernel-level debugger for the Windows NT OS family, and no home should be without one, surely. Even if sources were available, they'd likely be of limited interest or circulation, so this has hardly any chance of being a notable software product. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 14:20, 15 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:59, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NW (Talk) 01:15, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply] - The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.