Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/System of bilinear equations

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) —cyberpower ^Chat_{Limited Access} 17:23, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

System of bilinear equations

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Very short article which provides little to no context about the equations it is discussing. However, I would consider withdrawing this nomination if someone can flesh it out a bit. Eastlaw ^talk ⁄ _contribs 09:35, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep There's nothing wrong with a stub if it can be added to, and I don't see any obvious targets for merge/redirect, or any sign that this is material is duplicated in another article (there's no article bilinear equation, for instance). Google search throws up some hits, including academic papers[1][2]. We might redirect if there's a useful target. --Colapeninsula (talk) 10:53, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep I found at least two credible sources

– Johnson, C. R. (2009). "Solution theory for complete bilinear systems of equations". Numerical Linear Algebra with Applications. 16 (11–12). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: 929–934. doi:10.1002/nla.676. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)

– Cohen, S. (1997). "Systems of Bilinear Equations" (PDF). Technical Report STAN-CS-TR. 97 (1588). Stanford University, Department of Computer Science. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)

I am not familiar with the subject though and thus unsure whether I could provide much help with expanding the article. -- Toshio Yamaguchi (tlk−ctb) 13:43, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:18, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Der yck C. 17:13, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.