Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/T'Ralie-class transport
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. Keilana|Parlez ici 19:39, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
- T'Ralie-class transport (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Non-notable. I doubt that any significant third party refs exist to demonstrate notability. --Craw-daddy | T | 19:05, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak delete - the TV series is notable enough, but this particular topic doesn't have the notability to warrant an article. As said above, good third-party sources covering the topic would probably be hard to find. JamieS93 16:18, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge what little there is to Narn then delete. Hobit (talk) 16:31, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 17:59, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge to Narn as notability is not established and reliable secondary sources are unlikely. - Dravecky (talk) 19:08, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as uncited in-universe plot summary. --EEMIV (talk) 19:12, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete; one trivial mention in an inclusive directory doesn't meet WP:N. Possibly leave a redirect to Narn, but no more than that. Percy Snoodle (talk)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. —--Craw-daddy | T | 12:59, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Nothing to merge to Narn; therefore delete. B.Wind (talk) 04:37, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as there is no content or evidence of notability. Perhaps it should be merged to T'Ralie Chopper? --Gavin Collins (talk) 11:58, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per two pages of Google hits. –thedemonhog talk • edits 16:37, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.