Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TAK (audio codec) (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 10:41, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

TAK (audio codec) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This non-notable audio codec has no sources other than links to its developer and some web forums. Wikipedia is not a software directory! It was put up for AfD two years ago, it was kept on the argument that its features and performance were notable. That is not our criteria whatsoever. Miami33139 (talk) 17:28, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this codec. Joe Chill (talk) 20:26, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- Joe Chill (talk) 20:27, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete I was likewise unable to find significant coverage. Jujutacular ^T · C 03:43, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.