Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TCS Concordia (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. PeaceNT (talk) 07:45, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

TCS Concordia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

procedural nomination—version brought to AFD: Previously considered at AFD as part of a massive multiple nomination. PROD nominator states: "Does this series of ships have any real-world notability?" I would answer this with an echoing "no". User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 13:13, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. —User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 13:17, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Hut 8.5 16:30, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Unlikely secondary sources exist to establish notability. Doctorfluffy (talk) 15:31, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. I liked the games just fine, but there is nothing about this article that asserts any sense of notability. There is a perfectly good Wing Commander wiki out there to put all of this fictional material. Trusilver (talk) 18:05, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as fails WP:FICT. --Gavin Collins (talk) 12:10, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.