Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TCS Victory (2nd nomination)

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. JeremyA (talk) 16:53, 11 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

NN, D. ComCat 00:45, 3 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak Keep - Even though I'm not one for video games anymore, yet this already has a large and possibly notable parent article. UniReb 00:59, 3 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, especially considering that the nominator didn't bother to even use words when attempting to justify the nomination (what's "NN, D" supposed to mean?). Also, note that this article's been up for deletion before: Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/TCS Victory. There was no consensus at the time. Merging into a "spacecraft of" article is a possibility, perhaps, but there's rather a lot of material in Category:Wing Commander spacecraft so it'd make a pretty big article. Bryan 06:18, 3 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• keep per Bryan, and note that "NN, D" is extremely newbie-hostile. Kappa 12:41, 3 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• keep please it has already survived deletion before so why should we do this twice Yuckfoo 16:38, 3 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• weak keep. Wing Commander was a series, which in my mind helps this eke out notability.Nandesuka 02:08, 4 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. I was the person who wrote this article as an anonymous user back in October. It was nominated for deletion then and kept (rather, there was a merge result, but merging this and everything else in Category:Wing Commander spacecraft would make a really long article.) The TCS Victory is the most important ship in Wing Commander III. Sjakkalle (Check!) 07:11, 5 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. This is nothing but video game cruft. The other articles certainly don't justify it. / Peter ^Isotalo 19:20, 7 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.