- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. seresin ( ¡? ) 08:45, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- TESCAN (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Independent sources about this company seem to be lacking; it fails WP:CORP. PROD was contested, and the notability tag removed, by an IP user without comment. B. Wolterding (talk) 19:25, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Article makes one claim on notability, a national award, which I could not verify. Until some reliable sources are added, this article fails WP:CORP. TN‑X-Man 22:07, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Does this page contain links to any sites that would help the company meet the notability guideline? Fg2 (talk) 02:58, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Question – the second reference points to the main page of the Institute of Scientific Instruments of the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, not to a page that specifically mentions the company. Can you please provide a better link? Also need a source to verify the national award. 69.140.152.55 (talk) 06:45, 16 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 15:08, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as failing WP:CORP, but if a source can be found verifying the award, please disregard this comment. Lankiveil (speak to me) 12:42, 17 May 2008 (UTC).[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.