- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to video game content rating system. Skomorokh 12:26, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- TIGRS (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I'm not seeing proof of notability whatsoever, per WP:WEB Magog the Ogre (talk) 01:12, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak delete or rd as below; a fair number of ghits even after excluding other acronyms but no evidence of it being notable. JJL (talk) 01:25, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. MrKIA11 (talk) 11:51, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, not notable. Irbisgreif (talk) 15:20, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Questionable notability but a blatant copyvio of the site -- Cabe6403 (Talk•Sign) 17:50, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment It's briefly mentioned in Video game content rating system perhaps a redirect could go there in case anyone goes looking for it. APL (talk) 19:15, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Video game content rating system per APL. It's already mentioned there, might as well make it a plausible search term. Basically the article runs afoul of WP:NOTWEBHOST and copies from its website. I cannot see anything salvageable here. MuZemike 19:00, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.