Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TINO Methodology

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 15:04, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

TINO Methodology

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of notability. There is a claim of notability, but not evidence. The article has a "history" of the concept, but no details or description. (This could be fixed, if it is not proprietary.) [I'm guessing the category is "O" (product). Could be "S" (Society topics) or "T" (Technology).] — Arthur Rubin (talk) 17:05, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Article was previously speedily deleted at TINO under {{db-g11}}. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 17:21, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Both primary authors (even if different, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Mayajil) have edited only (with the possible exception of unrelated deleted edits) about this topic. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 17:29, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Strong delete It fails the general notability guideline and even though I will assume good faith, I suppose that this page might have been made in an attempt to legitimize companies offering this as a method, serving as a vanity page. Ging287 (talk) 17:38, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:09, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:09, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Dear Arthur and Ging287, thank you for your response to the TINO methodology article. I understand your questions about the notability. I would like to repeat that the methodology has not been publicly presented until last year. Within one year media all over the world have been writing about it and TEDx has asked for a presentation about the methodology. In addition, this page is not used as any kind of promotion. The founder of the methodology Haim Dror does not do any kind of marketing, which he also describes on the website of his company (www.humints.com).The reason why I created an article is to make people familiar with this new type of innovation strategy, just like there are pages about Blue Ocean Strategy and crowd-sourcing. I would be very happy to write more details about the method if you advice me to do so. Also, if you advice me to invite other people to edit the page (also people who have edited other Wikipedia articles), please let me know. There are already many people around the world who worked with the method and would be happy to contribute to this article. Again, I would be very happy to hear your advice and i hope this article can stay online. I believe the public should be able to read about it, especially because TINO is about the potential of every person. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mayajil (talk • contribs) 20:10, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:45, 16 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Absent some indication that it's been discussed in depth in WP:RS or that it's made some significant impact, I'm not seeing notability here. GoldenRing (talk) 12:54, 16 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:12, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.