- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 07:50, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
- TISFAT (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No evidence of notability of this software, and a Google search turned up nothing but download sites, message boards, and youtube videos. Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 17:46, 3 October 2014 (UTC)
- Delete - This software appears to have been completely ignored by reliable secondary sources, which are generally required for notability. Mz7 (talk) 22:56, 3 October 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:57, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. Some interesting sources showed up on Google Books search but satisfying GNG takes more than that. Best regards, Codename Lisa (talk) 20:19, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
- Interestingly, the description for the first GBooks result states: "Please note that the content of this book primarily consists of articles available from Wikipedia or other free sources online." So that one book strikes me as having a WP:CIRC issue. Mz7 (talk) 02:30, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.