- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. WP:WAX means it doesn't matter what other article exist, we can only look at the one before us, where there is a consensus to delete. Dennis - 2¢ 22:35, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
- TISFAT Zero (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No indication of notability yet, it may be WP:TOOSOON. Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 19:53, 2 October 2014 (UTC)
- @Ahecht: What exactly separates this page from similar ones (for example, the original TISFAT page, Pivot Animator) which, judging by your perception of lack of notability also fall under this issue? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Evar678 (talk • contribs) 20:04, 2 October 2014 (UTC)
- WP:OTHERSTUFF. What separates it from those is that I found the TISFAT Zero article while patrolling new pages and didn't catch the other two when they were created. The Pivot and TISFAT articles were created 7 and 8 years ago when notability standards were different (there wasn't even an official notability guideline when the TISFAT article was created), and I doubt they would have survived if this and this had been created today. I was able to find an About.com review for Pivot Animator, but the notability is still questionable. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 17:44, 3 October 2014 (UTC)
- WP:OTHERSTUFF. What separates it from those is that I found the TISFAT Zero article while patrolling new pages and didn't catch the other two when they were created. The Pivot and TISFAT articles were created 7 and 8 years ago when notability standards were different (there wasn't even an official notability guideline when the TISFAT article was created), and I doubt they would have survived if this and this had been created today. I was able to find an About.com review for Pivot Animator, but the notability is still questionable. --Ahecht (TALK
- Delete or move to a wiki about software. Inspected every single Google search results for this term and it was too disappointing. As for the offline sources, all I have to say is WP:BURDEN. No prejudice against deleting TISFAT and Pivot Animator; they suffer from the same issue as well. Best regards, Codename Lisa (talk) 20:59, 2 October 2014 (UTC)
- If this is the case then please do some inspecting on quite a large number of software (related and otherwise) listed on Wikipedia.
- Personally I find it astonishing that articles on Pivot Animator, TISFAT, Pencil2D, and a rediculously large number of software titles are and have been listed on Wikipedia for quite a long time now. Evar678 (talk) 21:07, 2 October 2014 (UTC)
- Pencil2D at least has a review in a major publication (Macworld). --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 17:44, 3 October 2014 (UTC)
- Pencil2D at least has a review in a major publication (Macworld). --Ahecht (TALK
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:17, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 16:55, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 22:23, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.