Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TOP DESIGN-BUILD FIRMS
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete. Lacking in content; purely original research. PeterSymonds (talk) 14:02, 25 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- TOP DESIGN-BUILD FIRMS (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
completely subjective list, possibly completed for spammy purposes. Ironholds (talk) 11:05, 25 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete, complete lack of context as well as original research and likely spam as noted. We don't even have an article on what's a design-build firm, and probably never should. Without that explanation, there's nothing to explain with this list. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 13:57, 25 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.