- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keepas notable and well-sourced. Bearian (talk) 21:47, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- TRIALOG Project (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
A Euro-NGO. An earlier version of this at TRIALOG was speedily deleted. Is it notable? -- RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 18:37, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete no apparent notability Mayalld (talk) 19:33, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
It sounds like an interesting project, why not keep it!? there are other articles in wikipedia which seem less important. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.178.168.213 (talk) 23:12, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 03:19, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. There are 915 gscholar hits. Additionally, the article is well-sourced, just in need of formatting. Seems to meet WP:N and WP:V. Billscottbob (talk) 04:26, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep and rewrite. It seems to publish a journal on development issues, with contributors from outside the group, so it is probably notable. DGG (talk) 13:58, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep I am aware of this organisation, but also know of people who might want to use Wikipedia to find out about it so it seems a sensible candidate for retention. 22 January 2008
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.