Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TTK (Leak Detection)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was already speedy deleted. postdlf (talk) 13:40, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

TTK (Leak Detection)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The only source ([1]) sounds promotional, and I could not find any better online. Hence, this article likely does not pass Wikipedia's notability guideline. Tigraan (talk) 15:43, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:56, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:56, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:56, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment by nominator: SwisterTwister nominated the article for speedy deletion under WP:G11. I disagree since (per the CSD page) any article that describes its subject from a neutral point of view does not qualify for this criterion, and I think the info in that article, non-notable as it may be, is written neutrally. Of course, I would not lose any sleep over it. Tigraan (talk) 11:02, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.