- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Wizardman 02:41, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- TTOA (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
The organisation does not seem to be notable - there is no evidence of significant coverage by reliable, independent secondary sources. A Google search for "Tempo & Topaz Owner Association" returns six results, two from the website itself, two from Wikipedia and two from forums. This would seem to be quite low for a notable website or organisation. Guest9999 (talk) 21:56, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- delete - no reliable sources to indicate notability -- Whpq (talk) 16:17, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No third party sources.jonathon (talk) 00:32, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.