Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TabletKiosk (2nd nomination)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Protonk (talk) 04:14, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
- TabletKiosk (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
I don't know if this company is notable. I think this article was made to advertise via linking to it from articles on the types of products they make. Habanero-tan (talk) 04:03, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 23:39, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Cirt (talk) 04:20, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- keep Google turns up many interesting hits. Apparently is now a popular maker of cheap tablet PCs. Potatoswatter (talk) 07:58, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Fails WP:CORP, there are no sources and it was edited by a user nicknamed TabletKiosk Gail, some notability. EconomistBR 17:41, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, kurykh 02:02, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. The article now has sources, because I found and added some references. -- Eastmain (talk) 02:30, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Properly sourced, could be a little more NPOV but notability is certainly established. Mister Senseless™ (Speak - Contributions) 03:00, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speed keep - Meets WP:CORP. Eastmain researched and added sources that establish notability. The argument of lack of notability is no longer sustainable. EconomistBR 03:01, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.