Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tad Damron

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete by an Admin per WP:A7. (non-admin closure) ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 14:21, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tad Damron

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Tad Damron (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article has been created, deleted under the various WP:G7 criteria, moved into draftspace, moved back into articlespace (what you are reading here) a number of times, and these events are in the most part only viewable by editors who are able to see deleted versions of this article. It would appear to me reasonable enough to create a deletion discussion to enable the participation of editors who do not hold those advanced permissions. WP:BEFORE done, and in my opinion this article does not meet WP:MUSICBIO, WP:ANYBIO and any number of other notability criteria. As always, I am happy to be proven wrong. Peter in Australia aka Shirt58 (talk) 09:45, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and West Virginia. Shellwood (talk) 09:50, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Not sure why it couldn't be simply deleted as A7, like I tagged, but anyway. Perhaps the creator needs to be sockpuppet checked as well, previous incarnations of the article were created by people afterwards blocked for sockpuppetry, which would make this a G5 candidate as well. In any case, total lack of notability. If deleted, please salt. Fram (talk) 10:05, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.