Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Taiwan Foundation for Democracy
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Withdrawn per WP:HEY. COI and copyright issues resolved by re-stubbing and subsequent expansion; notability was only secondary concern. Cybercobra (talk) 19:02, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Taiwan Foundation for Democracy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
There are significant copyright and conflict of interest issues with this article (see its history tab) and I am unable to find solid evidence of notability, although I admit I am not well-versed in the subject matter. Cybercobra (talk) 03:00, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Significant copyright violation of [1]; was created by User:TFD Taipei, which was indef blocked as a promotional corporate account, so conflict of interest issues abound. --Cybercobra (talk) 07:41, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Taiwan-related deletion discussions. cab (talk) 03:14, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Plenty of news articles and similar sources available: Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL. cab (talk) 03:14, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- What should change to make the wikipedia appropriate?417xinglong147 (talk) 03:54, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Reply don't copy their website (WP:COPYVIO). Instead, read newspaper articles about them. Then summarise those articles. cab (talk) 04:22, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep After cab's needed re-stubbing of the article, I have begun adding sources. English sources seem limited, but the Foundation attracts regular news coverage. It is still a stub, but at least has some references now. Jim Miller See me | Touch me 17:52, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.