Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Take it to the Box

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Coredesat 04:53, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Take it to the Box (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Unreferenced neologism janejellyroll 04:50, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Could be expanded by someone with good knowledge of the law. In other words, not me.--CJ King 04:54, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment, it is a slang amongst lawyers, but is only that. It is listed in the ideomatic dictionary, but gets only 12 ghits. SkierRMH 05:15, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment 2 do we have copyvio here? [1] SkierRMH 05:15, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Nope, it's a Wikipedia mirror. MER-C 10:53, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Rename to Legal slang. Since there is Medical slang, fair to have an article in Legal slang as well. Suggest WP:REDIRECT to Legal slang. Tonytypoon 05:43, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• I suppose it could form part of an article on legal slang, but right now it's just a dictdef. I'd say delete but userfy if anyone wants it. MER-C 10:53, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Dic def.Obina 11:44, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Wikipedia is not a dictionary, and this article lacks sources to pass WP:NEO.-- danntm ^T _C 22:11, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete sounds like an interesting Neologism, but fails WP:NEO. I hope to see it in a movie or on TV soon, to substantiate validity. I like the phrase. TonyTheTiger 03:39, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete a legal slang article would be interesting (hint, hint). Quadzilla99 06:18, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Changed my vote; not worthy of keeping.--CJ King 18:14, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.