Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Takuya Murata

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 08:02, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Takuya Murata

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Only a handful of journal articles with 0-1 citations, based on Google Scholar search (ignoring the math and biology articles by authors of the same name). No suggestion whatsoever of passing WP:SCHOLAR or WP:GNG. — MarkH21 (talk) 05:12, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. — MarkH21 (talk) 05:12, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. — MarkH21 (talk) 05:12, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. If the most you can say is that he wrote a book chapter, he isn't notable enough. There appears to be a different Takuya Murata, a molecular biologist at the University of Tokyo, with moderately well-cited publications (the top one of which was retracted) but since the area is totally different I think it must be a different person. (I didn't see any math articles; there is no one by this name on MathSciNet.) For the Takuya Murata described here, we have no evidence of passing WP:PROF nor any other notability criterion. —David Eppstein (talk) 06:19, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@David Eppstein: There is at least one arXiv preprint, like this, but unlikely to be the same person. — MarkH21 (talk) 07:22, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I don’t know if that matters, but that (arxiv one) is me. I am not the subject of this article too. My name isn’t that uncommon. —- Taku (talk) 12:03, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No independent sources. Xxanthippe (talk) 07:07, 7 November 2019 (UTC).[reply]
Delete. Fail passes WP:SCHOLAR or WP:GNG.--SalmanZ (talk) 13:39, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete getting a chapter published in a book does not make one notable. I still have not created an article on historian Jay Buckley, and he has authored multiple books.John Pack Lambert (talk) 05:37, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for now. It appears he was in a graduate program at the Hawaii Research Center for Futures Studies, but I can't find any solid information about him. Instead, I'm only finding passing mentions of him. For the moment, he doesn't pass any of the notability guidelines. ···日本穣 · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 23:03, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.