Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tales-from-the-Goondocks

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. Attack page. causa sui (talk) 17:18, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Tales-from-the-Goondocks (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence that the usage of this term is at all widespread. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 00:03, 18 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 05:41, 18 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per WP:NEO, although the ghits suggests it's more of a user name than a real slang term. PaintedCarpet (talk) 08:04, 18 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BusterD (talk) 00:18, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Exists but according to Google it never made the news or was reported in books. Borock (talk) 02:40, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete pointless scrap of totally non-notable forum drama, borderline speedy as attack page. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 15:03, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.