- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 18:09, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Tall Umbrella (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Contested prod. No assertion of notability. References are all to company's own web site. Google returns no reliable sources discussing this company. Unusual? Quite TalkQu 22:01, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, article fails to establish notability as per WP:CORP. Esradekan Gibb "Talk" 22:40, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No assertion of notability, no sources found via google and completely self-referenced Excirial (Contact me,Contribs) 00:16, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Improved since first posted. Added external sources. 209.234.159.97 (talk) 19:00, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:17, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: per WP:CORP. Schuym1 (talk) 17:48, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.